Draymond knew what the Warriors needed

That kid peeking over the interview table Saturday night after the Warriors win? That was the son of Draymond Green. Maybe not quite ready to hold a basketball, but he did bring a few more smiles to a post-game situation already filled with joy.

And more than a few memories.

It seems like only yesterday the offspring of another Warriors player entered the picture. Literally wriggling across the TV screen, Riley Curry kept escaping her father’s arms as he spoke to the media.

Yes, tempus sure does fugit. It was 2015, the NBA finals when the Warriors beat the Cavaliers. Riley is 9 now.

Draymond Green Jr. or “DJ,’ is 5. His dad, stitched up a bit, tough as ever, may have been the lynchpin in the 110-98 win over Memphis that gave the Warriors the Western Conference championship, four games to two, and elevated them into the next round against either Phoenix or Dallas.

It wasn’t just what Green did during the game, his defensive work and passing, as much as what he said before the game, advising interim coach Mike Brown to start Kevon Looney at center.

The Warriors had been shoved around in Game 5, falling behind by 55 points. They needed defense. They needed rebounding. Looney gave them both. He had 22 boards. Remarkable.

“They made it clear they were going to beat us up,” said Klay Thompson, who scored 30 points, one more than Curry. Andrew Wiggins played 41 minutes, getting 18 points and 11 rebounds. Yet the presence and performance of the 6-foot-9 Looney, in place of Jonathon Kuminga — who never got on the court — was the difference.

Looney was a Warriors first-round pick out of UCLA, but injuries (two hip surgeries) and ailments (stomach issues) kept him from becoming a consistent force. Besides, more often than not, the Warriors used their small lineup, the 6-6 Green starting at center.

But Memphis, bulkier and rougher, played physical basketball. Green made his recommendation and Brown, in charge with head coach Steve Kerr under COVID protocol, accepted the plan.

His teammates liked it because not only did they realize they were getting outmuscled but also because Looney, after all his hard work and rehab, is exceedingly popular.

Thompson decided Looney needed a new nickname. “He should go by ‘Kevon Looajuwon,” Klay insisted with an oblique reference to Hall of Famer Hakeem Olajuwon, “because he really was a freak out there.”

The leader and inspiration, Green, had a lot of good things to say about a lot of good people, especially those who had been with the team this past decade of success.

“We went two years out of the playoffs, in large part because of Klay’s absence,” Green said. “He’s probably the toughest and most competitive player I’ve played with ... And look at Loon.

“There was a lot of talk in this series about fouls, and this and that should be reviewed. But this was a great series with amazing teams.”

Dare we say father knows best?

Memphis bigs are a big problem for the Warriors

The headline was yet another reminder of sporting unpredictability: “Grizzlies are running out of time to go from good to great.”

It appeared Tuesday in the New York Times, roughly 24 hours before a one-time 55-point lead made the Grizzlies look quite great, stomping the Warriors, who looked quite terrible.

It was only on Saturday, in Game 3 of this NBA Western conference semifinal, that the Warriors appeared less than terrible, constructing a large lead of their own, more than 40 points, and you almost felt sorry for Memphis. Almost.

Game 6 is Friday, and although it’s at Chase Center in dear old San Francisco, where the Warriors are unbeaten so far this brief postseason, and although the Grizzlies remain without their best player, Ja Morant and his bad knee, crazy things happen. Like the Dubs falling 55 points behind.

NBA playoff series are like chess matches in sneakers. You try this move, and then the other team tries that move. Who said Steph Curry and Klay Thompson ought to try shooting better? The opponent is not allowing either to get open.

Memphis has a size advantage. The playoffs generally are more physical than regular season games, and the matchups are so similar, the guy guarding you knows every more you’re going to execute before you do.

There was no question Memphis was overly determined — summer is just a missed defensive assignment away. The question is whether the Warriors were, shall we say, less than attentive?

After the rout Wednesday in Memphis, Charles Barkley, who can be as pointed as he is knowledgeable, told the post-game audience on TBS that the Warriors merely “went through the motions.“

Maybe a little bit too strong about one of basketball’s more noteworthy franchises, but when you trail by half a hundred points, something is wrong. Now the issue is how to make it right, when you’re built on speed and shooting rather than on muscle.

On Wednesday, the Grizzlies out-rebounded the Warriors 55-37. Yes, Memphis has the 6-foot-11 Kiwi, Steven Adams, but the Warriors have handled big guys before.

“Part of it was their physicality,” said Warriors assistant Mike Brown. “We talked about an alertness and an awareness when it came to bodies, boxing people out early, and we didn’t have that. There were too many times throughout the game their bigs, or even their wings, just kind of ran by us, and we turn and look and they’re jumping over and coming up with the rebound.”

The Warriors’ tallest healthy players are 6-foot-9 Kevon Looney and Nemanja Bjelica. Draymond Green, 6-7, usually is the center when the Dubs go small.

No Gary Payton II, no Andre Iguodala. They’re injured. That happens. No intensity? That shouldn’t happen.

Word for Warriors is ‘Code’

SAN FRACISCO--If nothing else—and there is plenty—Steve Kerr added a new description to how basketball is played, and viewed: Code

The word usually is heard in military films—“Sir, we’ve broken the Russian code”—or in those poignant lyrics of  a Sinatra song, “…I could tell you a lot but a gentleman has to be true to his code.”

Now the word has become a part of this break-your-elbow, twist-your-knee NBA playoff between the (ouch!) Warriors and the (ow!)  Memphis Grizzlies,

Game 4 of their Western Conference semifinal will be played Monday night at Chase Center, the Warriors holding  a 2-1 lead and both sides holding on to their belief the other team is getting away with something immoral, if not illegal,

In a different era, somebody involved, whether directly as player or coach, or indirectly, might say something about dirty play or (shhh) poor officiating. But this is the 21st Century, and pro hoops must be spoken of carefully. Even if you play stupidly.

   But especially in the playoffs, when each game is magnified in importance, the game grows rougher. And you get somebody like Dillon Brooks of Memphis crashing into an airborne, unprotected Gary Payton II and taking him out for almost a month.

 And Kerr, who played the game with a bruiser and perhaps the  super-est of superstars, Michael Jordan, said Brooks broke the code. He meant while contact is acceptable, cheap shots which might end a player’s career are not.

That was Game 2, won by Memphis. Then, Saturday, Game 3, Ja Morant of the Grizzlies—who had 47 points in the Game, was caught between the Warriors’ Jordan Poole and Andrew Wiggins, In reaching for the ball Poole tugged on Morant’s injured knee.

Whether it was intentional—Poole was in full denial—or unintentional, didn’t matter to Morant, who after he left in frustration,  tweeted, “Broke Code.”

Morant was declared out of Monday’s game, giving the Warriors a huge advantage.. Not that the underdog doesn’t surprise. If an 80-1 shot can take the Kentucky Derby, any qualified team can take an NBA playoff game. Other than the Brooklyn Nets.

The Warriors’ 142-112  victory in Game 3 was a reminder of their championship seasons when they won three titles and were runner-up twice, shooting 63 percent overall on field goals, 53 perc  tent on 3 -pointers and 90 percent (19 of 21) on free throws. That had been done only once previously, by the 2001 76ers.

Indeed, as Kerr (and Steph Curry frequently point out ab0ut points, the offense is a product of the defense. Force the opponent to miss, grab the rebound and then flee to judgment—or at the least an easy basket.

It doesn’t hurt that Klay Thomson more and more  regained his confidence and his touch in no particular order. Klay was 8 of   13 for 21 points, behind Steph’s 30 and Poole’s 27.

As he should have been Kerr was thoroughly delighted, not only by the victory but by the method it was accomplished. Not many games, in regular season  or playoff, where you hit the 100 point mark with 28 seconds left in the third quarter. Nor when rookie Jonathan Kuning starts, He was taking the place of Gary Payton.

“We wanted to replace Gary’s athleticism, around the rim,” said Kerr. “Memphis is a really athletic team.”

 But can it crack the code?

Draymond likes his rep, even if NBA officials don’t

Reputations are inescapable. Draymond Green understands that, as much as he understands how best to play basketball, aggressively, intensely, unforgivingly.

“I’m never going to change the way I play,” said Green in what could be considered as much a threat as a promise.

He was speaking to the media in Memphis, where on Tuesday night in Game 2 of the NBA Western Conference semifinals he hopes to do what he could not in Game 1: stay on the floor.

Green was tossed, ejected, with 1:18 left in the first half for what was described as a flagrant foul — one of many he’s received over time but in truth was a league response to that prickly reputation.

That the Warriors managed to beat the Grizzlies, 117-116, verified the idea that Golden State once more is among the sport’s elite franchises.

What Green verified was that he remains true to his style and beliefs. “The way I play,” Green said with a softness that belied his determination, “got me three NBA champions, four All-Stars and a Defensive Player of the Year.”

The championships, of course, in concert with people named Steph Curry (he had 24 points Sunday night in Game 1) and Klay Thompson (he hit the go-ahead 3-pointer with 36 seconds). One of the new guys, if you will, Jordan Poole, had 31.

So Draymond did foul Brandon Clarke, hitting Clarke in the face as he leaped to stop a jumper. Then as Green tumbled, he reached out and grabbed Clarke’s jersey, pulling hm to the court.

It made great theater, replay after replay being shown while the officials debated the severity of the foul. On ABC-TV the announcers, including Mark Jackson — your presumed next coach of the Sacramento Kings — didn’t think it was a flagrant 2, which results in ejection.

But it was. Green jauntily ran by the Warriors’ bench, slapping teammates’ hands in farewell, and quickly dashed to the locker room, done for the game.

According to the New York Post, Green had been prepared to start dancing at the call because he thought the Grizzlies would be charged with the foul.

But he was haunted by the past, the memories of Draymond being suspended in the 2016 finals, the one he blew, a 3-1 game lead lost to LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers.

It’s like the kid in the third grade who acts up and then is admonished in front of the class by the teacher. From then on, he’s blamed every time there’s trouble, even if he is innocent.

On a postgame podcast, Green conceded what we all have come to realize, that suspicions linger, and who better to accuse of wrongdoing than the serial wrongdoer.

“If you’re involved in this play,” Green conceded on the podcast, “you probably shouldn’t dance. You should expect the unexpected.” A very good point by a man who, before he was ousted, got six points.

“We went through the definition of a flagrant 2 foul,” said Green. “I’m not sure that play would quite fit the definition of a flagrant 2 foul. I’m not sure it’ll meet that criteria.”

Apparently, it meets whatever criteria the NBA decides.

“Let me say reputations are earned,” said Draymond. “I love my reputation. It made me who I am in the NBA. Coming from a 35th pick who they said would never play a day. So I appreciate my reputation, in the NBA, well, here I am on TV in your living room; you come to games. I’m not one to shy away from it.”

As NBA officials are only too aware.

Warriors playoffs: Everything except Durant

Eight points is nothing. Steve Kerr told us that, emphasizing how quickly a lead — or deficit — can disappear in the NBA. But at the end of their playoff game against Denver, four points was everything for the Warriors.

They were winners, 102-98, on Wednesday night. That’s the way the league likes it.

Not necessarily favoring one team or another — although the Lakers do jack up the TV ratings — but favoring games that keep the ending in doubt and the customers involved.

Games that finish with a sigh of relief. Or a shout of frustration.

The NBA sometimes seems a mashup of talent, hysteria and unpredictability, a perfect blend in this age of Twitter and three-pointers.

When we last looked, the Warriors still were in the postseason and the Brooklyn Nets, the preseason favorites, were not. Kevin Durant had a great final game for the Nets but missed chunks of the season because of a knee injury.

Durant left the Warriors after the 2019 playoffs, because, according to some, he wanted to be on a team where he was the main man.

On the Warriors, then and now, that role has belonged to Steph Curry.

Which seems quite acceptable to his teammates.

You need stars, people who shoot like Steph, Klay Thompson and now Jordan Poole; people who play defense and control the pace, like Draymond Green.

You also need understanding and cooperation.

What would the Warriors have been like with a healthy Durant as part of the equation for another season or two? They did win two championships with him. Ah, to contemplate what never will be.

And also to contemplate how far the Warriors might go in these playoffs.

They have the third man on offense, Poole, joining Curry and Thompson. They very well might have the second man on defense, Gary Payton II.

“He fills a lot of different roles,” Curry said about Payton. “If (on offense) he’s making his catch-and-shoot threes, he’s tough to game-plan against, because you probably got your big man on him. He can roll to the basket.

“What he gives us on defense is amazing already, and then when you put teams in different positions, when they are defending us, he’s kind of roaming all over the place.”

If Payton, whose father graduated from Skyline High in Oakland before going to Oregon State and the pros, seems a bit of a surprise, well, the NBA is full of surprises. Who imagined the Lakers and LeBron James wouldn’t even be in the playoffs?

Curry, who had been out the last couple weeks of the regular schedule because of a foot injury, started the Wednesday night game against the Nuggets after coming off the bench the previous four games.

“You put your ego aside and understand things change quickly,” said Curry, who scored 30. In the final seconds, he put his hands together miming as if he were going to sleep, using his hands as the pillow. Bad taste or good fun?

“It’s nice to have home-court advantage in a game like (Wednesday),” said Curry. Four of the five games were at Chase Center in San Francisco. “We haven’t been here in so long, and close-out games are difficult.

“Like we need to feed off the crowd. I was trying to make sure they knew how much they meant to us, and how to keep them engaged. It was fun. It was electric. It was loud. It was kind of collective anxiousness in there, and a great celebration afterward.”

Something Kevin Durant, with the Nets, didn’t get to experience.

Deebo knows how to get yards — and attention

Very clever of Deebo Samuel. Obviously, he’s as adept at getting attention as he is at running or catching a football. Who knew?

So much going on, the Warriors about to take their first-round series in the playoffs — that’s a given; we need no fat lady singing — the Giants getting noticed by the New York Times, and the A’s in their endless (and seemingly hopeless) attempt to build a ballpark, making headlines if not progress.

So what can a self-declared unappreciated halfback sulking away down in Florida do but declare he wants to be traded?

You say he can meet with the people in charge of his current (and probably future) team, the 49ers, and with his advisors hold a businesslike discussion?

Thanks, but this is sports, and you’ve got to make as much noise as possible to try to make as much money as possible.

Samuel implied the issue isn’t money (although we know it’s always money) but that he doesn’t like being used as both a running back and receiver. The season for the 49ers ended in early January, when they lost to the Rams one game short of the Super Bowl. Samuel then virtually disappeared until in mid-April ESPN’s Jeff Darlington said Deebo was disenchanted.

On Monday, the Niners had their traditional pre-draft media session. However, it was anything but traditional. The first question hurled at general manager John Lynch was about Samuel.

So was the next. And the next. And the next. Not that Lynch was caught off guard. After all, he is a Stanford man, as well as a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

“I know you guys have jobs to do,” conceded Lynch, “and everyone’s very curious about Deebo and what’s going on there.”

Indeed. A man who caught the most passes, who gained much of the yards, who in effect was a one-man offense.

What is going on there?

”You guys have seen the stories and all that,” said Lynch, which naturally we had. “And like I said, I’m not going to get into those particulars because I don’t think it’s productive.”

Productive in providing material for reporters and columnists and TV commentators? Productive in affecting a possible transaction?

The more we know, well, the more we know. But what general managers know — how and why a pro football team is put together, or torn apart — just remain secret.

“You talk about the sanctity of keeping these things private,” Lynch was asked. ”Clearly this is no longer private. Does that bother you?”

As pointed out, Lynch comes well prepared. Hey, last year didn’t he trade all those draft picks for the quarterback (Trey Lance) who will throw or handoff to Deebo? (Well, maybe not.)

The next season, it’s whether Samuel will be around to get the ball.

Whether he or the Niners have leverage in the situation is debatable. Samuel remains under contract to San Francisco. If he doesn’t play for the Niners, he doesn’t get paid.  

Then again, if he doesn’t play for them, and no deal is made, the offense will be in trouble.

“I can’t ever imagine wanting to move on from Deebo,” was the cryptic comment from Lynch. He might not imagine it, but that doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be forced into doing it.

“You put yourself through exercises of — even though we don’t have a first, you go through the process. He’s just too good a player; 2019, the 36th pick; to come up with someone like Deebo, who to me has been a game-changing player for our franchise.

“As (Arizona State coach) Herman Edwards says, it’s about when will meets skill. Do you let guys like that walk? I can’t imagine a scenario where we would.”

But what’s the scenario seen by Samuel, the man who runs, not walks?

Warriors’ Big Three bring nostalgia and talent

The head coach, Steve Kerr, called it a good lineup. Let’s do him better. It’s a great lineup, a lineup that features three of basketball’s best the past few years, a lineup that unfortunately hasn’t been together much this season

A lineup that was on court Saturday night in a reminder and rejuvenation, when the Warriors pounded the Denver Nuggets, 123-107, winning game one of the playoffs.

A lineup that surely will be used Monday night when the Warriors, again playing at Chase Center, hope to hold on to their home court advantage.

A lineup bringing together nostalgia and talent.

Jordan Poole, the almost new guy, was — well, is brilliant too strong a word? — dominant with 30 points. And Kevon Looney, hardly a stranger, was the defender and rebounder he’s required to be.

Still, what was joyful, as well as successful, was having three of the old favorites return and work together as they did in the not-so-distant vintage years.

There they were, Steph Curry (you knew he would be playing despite being out the last few weeks with that ankle injury); Klay Thompson (after all he went through missing two straight seasons, he wasn’t going to miss this chance; and Draymond Green (whose absence for several weeks because of an injury was noticeable).

Our athletic heroes come and go with alarming speed. Buster Posey was a rookie yesterday, or so it seems, and now he has retired. Serena Williams is done. There’s always a new kid on the block. So appreciate what we have until we no longer have it.

Who knows how far the Warriors will go this season? The Suns finished with a far better record. Curry, echoing the thoughts of those who feel disrespected and unappreciated, complained before the post-season began.

“Nobody is picking us to come out of the west," he said. "At least I don't think, except our families.” Which is understandable. The Dubs had too many people hurt.

Now the injured are back. Now it’s a page from the past. Except the Warriors are older, and there are numerous younger guys, ready to move in. It’s the nature of sport. And life.

Steph, Klay and Draymond are still around, however, giving their all and giving us an opportunity. Five years from now, we’ll reminisce, and then realize what we had — if we haven’t realized it already.

“It’s very special,” Thompson said of working his way back and reuniting with the other two — and returning to the playoffs.

“I thought about all the days in the gym.” Thompson said of his long rehabilitation, “in the doctor’s office, on the surgery table, and just be flying up and down the court, be knocking shots down and playing solid defense.

“It was a surreal moment for me, and to do it in front of the crowd we had, I give Dub nation amazing credit. They were so loud as we ran through the tunnel. Just something I won’t take for granted, just being able to play basketball. It was very surreal to me.”

For the rest of us, it was actual and wonderful. We hear and read negative things about athletes, so to hear Thompson and his teammates relish what they have is reassuring.

That the Big Three have teamed to win championships is not to be underestimated. That’s the essence of their popularity. But there’s more.

They’ve won hearts as well as games. One is just as important as the other. Watch and enjoy.

McIlroy reminds us how special a golfer he can be

AUGUSTA, Ga. — His name went from nowhere to high on the leader board, but not high enough. Everybody knew Rory McIlroy wasn’t going to win this Masters.

But at least they knew him.

Knew of his brilliance as a virtual kid. Knew of his four major championships. Knew of that collapse in another Masters that even now, more than a decade later, seems to identify Rory more than his victories.

On a Sunday when the weather reminded us of the beauty of springtime, McIlroy reminded us of how special a golfer he can be.

The 2022 Masters was destined on Saturday to be won by Scottie Scheffler, who was miles ahead heading into the final round, and a few hours later that’s what happened, Scheffler shooting a 1-under-par 71 for 278.

What we never guessed was McIlroy, who has won a U.S. Open, British Open and PGA Championship — all but the precious Masters, and that’s what stings — would come up with the week’s best, an 8-under-par 64.

That placed him at 281, which left him three behind Scheffler, who McIlroy called the best golfer in the world — after four wins over the last two and a half months, it’s hard to disagree — and also left Rory in a great mood.

McIlroy, now 32, was touted as the next Tiger Woods, and even though we know there’s never going to be a next Tiger Woods, whether it’s McIlroy or Scheffler or anybody ever, there was a bit of a link this Masters, Woods reminding us of his fighting spirit and Rory reminding us of his potential.

And because we dwell on the failure that has stained his career until now. It will until he does win a Masters.

Which with his skill and at his age is quite likely.

“I’ve had the lead on the back nine here and couldn’t get it done,” said McIlroy.

Indeed. It was 2011. McIlroy was blowing them away the first three days. He constructed a four-stroke lead. Then it was as if he never played the game before.

On the 10th tee, that fourth-round McIlroy’s drive was so awful it hit one of the little cottages — they’re known here as cabins — and sent fans ducking and his game into oblivion. An 8-over-par 80 left him in a tie for 15th, and left the skeptics ruminating: Would he ever recover?

He did win the Open that summer. He’s still not won a Masters to complete the career grand slam.

He needs to play as he did Sunday.

“I think it’s being a little more aggressive,’’ he said, “but especially Thursday in this golf tournament is not the day to be super aggressive. It’s a day to just hang in there.”

He hung in, and then with 18 holes to go, he attacked. Birdies and an eagle and a rush towards the top. But not to the top.

He was the longest driver in the tournament, averaging 320 yards. He’s never been the best putter, however, and even though he also led in greens in regulation, you’ve got to get the ball into the cup.

“I’ve always known that I can do it,” said McIlroy about playing well in the Masters.

“I love playing good enough around here. I just haven’t strung four rounds together like that, but I’ve always known I have the game to win at this place.”

He just needs to prove it.

Whatever Tiger shot, it was a victory

AUGUSTA, Ga. — There will be no references here to Cinderella’s coach pulling away into the gloom. No questions asking whether Tiger Woods stayed too long at the fair.

The game turned on Tiger on Saturday, as it does on so many golfers no matter their age or condition — remember, he’s 46 and still getting rehab on a reattached foot.

No matter whether the tournament is a local pro-am or as prestigious and difficult — at least for him; it sure isn’t difficult for Scottie Scheffler — as the third round of the Masters.

Woods shot a 6-over-par 78. He had three double bogies, one a four-putt. He played the final three holes, 16, 17 and 18, four over.

It left him, and his fans who tramped after him, depressed. It also left them with perspective.

Only a week ago, many people doubted that, 14 months after a car accident so serious that one law enforcement officer said Woods was lucky to be alive, he could play in the Masters, much less any tournament.

But he played, and he made the cut. That his scores climbed each successive round was unimportant. He made us understand what’s possible. In sports, in life.

He’s won 15 majors, 82 tournaments overall. But going the distance this Masters, no matter where he is on the scorecard, and after 54 holes he’s tied for 41st, may be his most impressive win ever.

There are days when the sun is warm and the flowers are in full bloom that Augusta National seems to be the greatest place on earth for a golfer.  

The clouds never broke Saturday. The wind whistled, and the temperature was in the 50s. For the young, in-shape guys, that was OK. For a guy who is not so young and needs to ice the repaired body parts, it was a struggle.

Asked if he were bothered by the change in conditions, Woods said, “Changed? It hadn’t changed. It’s been hard. (Saturday) was a challenge with the conditions. They were tough today. They were tough Friday. But at least (then) we got a little bit of a lull at the end.

“I mean, it’s just like I hit a thousand putts out there on the greens,” said Woods. “I didn’t hit it that bad, but had two three-putts and a four-putt.” The latter was on that demonic 5th green, which is too far away and steep for many fans to have seen up close.

“Obviously, it affected the score. You take those (extra putts) away and I have a normal score.”

As golfers know all too well, putting is very much a part of the game, arguably the most critical part.  A three-inch putt counts the same number of strokes as a 300-yard drive.

And on the first two days of the Masters, it was Tiger’s putting that kept him marginally in contention.

Yet this tournament has been uplifting, for Woods and for golf.

“Never give up,” he said of what others might gain from this Masters. “Each and every day presents a challenge. Each and every day, I get up and start the fight all over again.”

Which is the best anyone can do.

Masters is missing one master: Phil

AUGUSTA, Ga. — He’s not on the leader board. The people up there are Scottie Scheffler, Charl Schwartzel — a past champion — and Sungjae Im.

Great golfers, certainly, at least great enough to play in this first major championship of the year.

But not great names. Like Phil Mickelson.

Still, they’re here. Who knows where Phil is? Suspended? Hiding out? Preparing for the Champions Tour? The mystery, perhaps self-created by Phil, will not be solved until someone speaks out.

It all seems contrary to the nature of golf, a sport more than any other built around honesty and openness. Contestants keep their own scorecards; players are expected call penalties on themselves.

But it’s also a sport where the people in charge, the administrators, are absurdly protective, reluctant to be candid.

Someone in the NFL or NBA is fined or suspended, we are given the facts and the fees. Golf gives us the runaround.

Several years ago, Dustin Johnson, who is very much in contention halfway through this Masters, virtually disappeared from golf.

He was stepping away, we were told. Was it because he had been stepped on by the Tour, suspended? That was the rumor.

It’s been a difficult few months for Mickelson. His idea of remodeling the “greedy” PGA Tour, more specifically the money distribution, by uniting with the Saudis, embarrassed Mickelson, who hasn’t played anywhere since.

The shame is Phil had made history in 2021 by taking the PGA  Championship at age 50, becoming the oldest man ever to win a major.

“He’s been a big part of our history,” Augusta National chair Fred Ridley said of Mickelson. “I certainly and we certainly wish him the best, sort of working through the issues he’s dealing with right now.”

Ridley was asked during a Wednesday news conference whether the Masters had “disinvited” Mickelson. Ridley denied that had happened.

Mickelson has not played a tour event since January, and it is not clear when he might return to competition. He has made 29 starts at the Masters, and this year will mark the first time he has not participated since 1994, when he was recovering from a broken leg suffered in a skiing mishap. Mickelson, who won the Masters in 2004, 2006 and 2010, reportedly was not in attendance Tuesday at the annual champions’ dinner.

“I know I have not been my best,” he wrote in a February statement, “and desperately need some time away to prioritize the ones I love most and work on being the man I want to be.”

When will that be? If Phil thought his appearance would have a negative effect on the Masters, well, the opposite is true. The media, the public, want to know why he’s absent.

Tiger Woods returned this Masters after that awful auto accident. Phil also returning would have awarded the tournament its finest champions of the last 20 years, and revived a hint of their tremendous rivalry.

Come on back, Phil.

Once more, the Masters belonged to Tiger

AUGUSTA, Ga. — Once again, the Masters belonged to a master, taking us back in time to what not even half a year ago seemed an impossible dream.

Tiger Woods got around Augusta National on Thursday without a limp and with only two bogies.

That after an opening-round 1-under-par 71 he was several shots out of the lead that mattered much less than the fact he was very much in the tournament.

It was Feb. 23, 2021, that Woods was in a rollover car accident so serious one law enforcement official insisted Tiger was fortunate to survive. 

His right foot had to be reattached, and the thought of him walking normally again, much less a full 18 holes in a round at one of game’s most difficult courses, seemed unlikely.

But there he was, wearing a glowing pink shirt and hollered on by a massive crowd of fans — sorry, patrons — saving pars and, some cynics might say, golf itself.

Even nature seemed to be welcoming Woods and the Masters, the sun making an appearance after days of thunderstorms that drenched the property to the point that play Thursday was delayed a half hour.

But once it began, golf got the unexpected joy of Woods, who roamed from one hole to the next and kept adding followers, like the Pied Piper.

Sure, there were other golfers on the course, including the Australian Cameron Smith, who double-bogied one, double-bogied 18 and still had a 4-under 68, a shot behind leader Sungie Im. But they were bit players in this story.

Woods, now 46, won five Masters in his younger, dominant days (one fewer than the record six of Jack Nicklaus), and because of his history (including but not limited to the auto crash), you’d have to say he didn’t disappoint us. Or himself, although certainly he hoped (if not planned) to be in first place, no matter the circumstances.

The first question to Woods after he signed his scorecard was an interesting one: “Considering what’s transpired over the last 14 months, how would you describe your emotions leading to the first shot on the first tee this morning?”

Woods had prepared himself, as he always does for any situation, discourse or divots. From the moment he arrived, there were cameras as well as curiosity.

“Well, I did not have a very good warmup at all,” Woods began. “I hit it awful. As my dad (used to say), did you accomplish your task?

“That’s exactly what I did (mentally), not blocking physically to avoid hitting a hook. I felt, hey, I’m warm. Go play. Let’s just go get it done. You know where to put it. Execute each shot.”

If that sounds like somebody who has just taken a lesson, not somebody who has won 82 PGA Tour events, well, even the greatest are prone to slipping back on occasion, if not for long.

And not having competed in any regular tournament for more than a year, much less a major such as the Masters, Woods had to have some nerves. 

“I was able to get to the red,” he said, talking about the numbers on the scoreboard designating under par.  “I made two stupid mistakes (the bogies). But to end up in the red, that’s right where I want to be.” 

Tiger is right where the golfing public, and the media, want him to be, playing again where he gained fame.

“The thing I came up here for,” he said, “was a test run to see if I was able play 27 holes (including the par-3 contest). And once the adrenaline kicks in, I get fired up and into my world.”

An opening day of the Masters again belonged to Tiger.

Of course Tiger was going to play

AUGUSTA, Ga. — Of course he was going to play.

Tiger Woods hadn’t come to Augusta National just to check out what Hideki Matsuyama was going to serve as the featured dish at the Champions Dinner.

He came to show us he could still could play. Came to show himself he still could play.

“You da man,” is the accurate if ungrammatical shout for Woods. He is and has been since that emphatic, historic Masters victory in 1997, the one that changed competitive golf — the whole tour started lifting weights and working out — and our response.

The Masters had Hogan and Snead, Palmer and Nicklaus. But until Woods and his fist pumps, it never had a golfer who appealed to the masses and especially to ethnic groups.

It wasn’t so much that he changed golf. He changed the way the world approached golf.

It no longer was a genteel pastime where an official in a voice barely above a whisper would remind, “Quiet, please.” It had evolved into a a boisterous confrontation, Giants vs. Dodgers, Packers vs. Cowboys — partisan instead of polite.

Golf purists were horrified, saying in essence, “Look what they’ve done to my game.”

If Woods were on the course, the first question was “How’s Tiger doing?” And that led to learning what everybody else was doing.

ESPN understood. It goes for names as much as it goes for games, and there is no name larger than Tiger’s. It didn’t so much cover an event as it covered Tiger.

An ESPN SportsCenter segment on a tournament, anywhere, anytime, would start with Woods, no matter how poorly he played. It was infuriating. And brilliant.

There is a precedent from another era, Arnold Palmer’s. Writers might tell you Arrnie wasn’t in a tournament rather than who was in.

“Why don’t you mention the other guys, then the fans will know who they are?” a PGA Tour official once told me.

Correct, the fans will know they aren’t Arnold Palmer.

Woods said his start in the Masters on Thursday is, borrowing from the NFL, a “game-time decision.” He’s not worried about hitting the shots. He’s never lost that ability, although at age 46 he doesn’t have the length of the big hitters.

He’s concerned with the condition of the right foot that was surgically reattached after the rollover car accident some 14 months ago. At the time, an LA County sheriff said that Woods was lucky to be alive.

The Masters course, Augusta National,  is hilly and long, and Woods, along with every other golfer in the field, must walk every step of the way. Yet, proud and intense, Tiger would not have made what seemed a surprising decision to enter if he were not confident of going the full 18 holes.

“I’ve worked hard,” said Woods, as if he required a reason to compete. “My team has been unbelievable. I’m lucky to have great surgeons and physicians. We’ve worked hard to get to this point, to get this opportunity to walk the grounds and test it out. To see if I can do it.”

He'll do it. Tiger is anything but a quitter, as we were reminded in the 2008 U.S. Open at Torrey Pines when on a leg injured so painfully he grimaced on every swing and won — needing to go an extra 18 holes in a playoff.

Everyone will be watching Tiger. He’s not going to want to disappoint. “My recovery has been good,” he said. “I’m excited.”

He’s certainly not the only one.

“I’ve had to endure pain before,” he said, anticipating his struggle. “This is different, obviously. This is a lot more traumatic. It gets agonizing and teasing. The simple things take hours.”

Success never is simple. It demands all that a person can offer. Woods has won the Masters five times, and so after what he’s gone through, someone asked whether Woods thought he could win again.

“I do,” he said.

Or else he wouldn’t play.

Is Tiger teasing or going to The Masters?

This was a few years ago when he was starting to lose his hair but certainly hadn’t lost his grip on the game. There were rumors Tiger Woods was going bald, so at a pre-tournament press conference, playing a game other than golf, with a grin lifted his cap for a moment.

 It was a Tiger tease.

 Which makes one wonder about his very non-secret flight to Augusta (Georgia, of course, not Maine) Tuesday morning.

Is he really going to defy logic and the predictions and compete in the Masters next week? Or is he just teasing? With Tiger I’ve learned since his days at Stanford, virtually anything can happen.

His career has been a succession of comebacks, disapprovals, and verifications.

He was five holes down to Steve Scott in the 1996 U.S. Amateur at Pumpkin Ridge in Oregon and I went on the phone to KNBR in San Francisco while the match still was underway. saying Scott would win.

Not only was I wrong but Willie McCovey (it is the Giants station after all) later berated me for a lack of both insight and faith. Woods rallied to become the only male to win three straight Amateurs.

The 2008 U.S. Open at Torrey Pines, Woods’ knee was in such pain (he had undergone an operation and would have two more) he could barely walk. Every swing brought a grimace.

 Ninety holes (a full extra round for the playoff) brought him the victory over Rocco Mediate. Followed by more surgery.

 Who could foresee that remarkable Masters triumph of 2 He hadn’t won anything for years, He was 43.

It’s wrong to say Tiger has done the impossible, because if were impossible, he couldn’t have done it. So say extraordinary. If he tees up in the 2022 Masters some 13 plus months after an auto accident which could have been fatal, this will be extraordinary.

Woods teamed with 12-year-old son Charlie in the PNC event in December. But that was only a 36-hole tournament on a flat course in Florida, and he was permitted to use a cart. The Masters course, Augusta National is extremely hilly, and Woods, as everyone in the field, would need to walk every step.

Did he make it through Tuesday’s round? Will he make it through four rounds of the tournament, or two, if he misses the cut? 

You can be certain Woods is ready. So too is the world. Tiger is the most compelling figure in sports, a hero, a trailblazer, even to some a heartbreaker.

Tiger, one supposes, is forcing the issue because it’s his nature. He’s a competitor . He’s the guy who battles back from four down. Who revives his image when it’s tarnished.

Some will note his achievements, the 15 major championships, only three fewer than the record 18 by Jack Nicklaus; the 81 PGA Tour victories than Sam Snead, and ask why is Tiger doing this

  Why not? It’s what he’s done, at lea`st until the car accident, with a special appeal. Actors act, painters paint, golfers play golf.

Woods also designs courses, His work added character and charm to the remodel of the little Peter Hay nine at Pebble Beach. Yet he’s more recognized for winning the 2000 U.S. Open on the main Pebble links.

The essential factor is desire, love of the. You need to be driven, to show yourself. As well as showing others,

 Who dared imagine Tiger Woods had a chance to play the Masters? Tiger Woods, That’s who. And he’s the only one who matters. No teasing.

Fritz does what he never thought possible

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — This was early, about the time the uproar had been silenced into disbelief, their hero — good grief — having lost the opening four games when one of his super fans, the type who wave Spanish flags, shouted plaintively, “Let’s go Rafa.”

But on Sunday, Rafael Nadal wasn’t going anywhere. Except to his first loss in 21 matches this year, beaten 6-3, 7-6 (6) by Taylor Fritz, the guy who now may be going places.

Nobody goes undefeated (in the NFL, yes, the ‘72 Dolphins were the exception), particularly in a spurt where you’re traveling around the world and playing hurt, which Nadal was Sunday. So many types of courts. So many different opponents. So whlle Rafa, with his 21 Grand Slam championships, always is a story, Fritz in many ways is a bigger one.

Especially since he virtually grew up at Indian Wells, the desert resort owned by Larry Ellison (he was in the stands Sunday) a hundred miles or so from Fritz’s home in San Diego. Especially since Fritz, 24, is the first American to win the tournament since Andre Agassi some 20 years ago.

It’s a bit overboard to say this was a generational change for the sport in America, but the U.S. has been looking for some men who can perform like Jim Courier — who was there in the Tennis Channel booth at the BNP Paribas Open. Or Pete Sampras. Or Michael Chang. Or Andre Agassi. Or Andy Roddick (the last American to win a major, the 2003 U.S. Open).

Fritz wasn’t thinking so grandiosely. But this victory over the 35-year Nadal (whether or not Nadal had to call for the trainer after getting skunked in he first set) was transcendental in the hoping, the hype, and finally the win. Now, does Francis Tiafoe burst through the door?

Fritz, whose mother and father were tennis pros, said as a kid he thrilled to the cheers he heard for the great players and wanted to earn some on his own. Those came inside 23,000-seat Stadium One, where in an earlier match Iga Swiatek pounded wind-blown Maria Sakkari in the women’s final, 6-4, 6-1.

Fritz, who’s built like an outside linebacker, tweaked an ankle in his semifinal win on Saturday, but he wasn’t going to sit out a chance for glory. If Nadal could play with pain, a kid trying for a breakthrough was no less determined to be across the net.

“Yeah, I mean, I'm just so lucky I was able to go out there, play really well,” said Fritz, “and not be hindered at all by something that I thought.”

Fritz was asked if he could put into words his emotions, and he tried mightily.

”I mean, no. It's like after the match I kept saying, I'm going to cuss, but I said no effing way, no effing way, I can't believe it's real. I signed the camera, I just put question marks. Stunned. Couldn't even believe it. Seriously, this is like a childhood dream come true, like a wild dream you never expect to actually happen. It really hasn't even sunk in.”

It will, and he’ll become a target, the player everyone will want to beat, the way Fritz wanted to beat the big guns.

“I think to do it against Rafa in the end that's like the, I don't know, icing on the cake,” said Fritz. “It's just insane. Someone that I watched like dominate, win everything.

“I didn't watch a ton of tennis growing up, but it's tough to not know these guys, knowing they're literally winning everything, their Grand Slam finals, all their battles. It's insane to even be on the same court with these people, much less be able to beat one of them, to win such a big tournament. To do it here in Indian Wells, as well, the combination of all these crazy things that I never thought possible.”

But as we found out and Taylor Fritz showed, they are possible.

Fritz wins, and Rafa enters the picture

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — Taylor Fritz was talking about what some would say was the biggest win of a growing career, and there over his shoulder in the interview room at Indian Wells was a television shot of, yes, Rafael Nadal.

That’s the way it is in tennis, a sport where you virtually aren’t allowed to get your moments without somebody else intruding, if unintentionally.

There’s always another game, another match, especially at the BNP Paribas Open, where the action is compressed to a point you wonder not so much who’s on the court but who isn’t.

On Saturday, in the usual 80-degree-plus temperature of the California desert in March, Fritz, the underdog if only barely, knocked off Andrey Rublev, 7-5, 6-4.

Then in the other half of a doubleheader that filled the 23,000-seat Stadium One, Rafa (phew) made it by fellow Spaniard Carlos Alcaraz, 6-4, 4-6, 6-3.

That puts Fritz and Nadal into the Sunday final of an event that’s a notch or two down from the Grand Slams. They’ll play following the women’s final between Iga Swiatek and Maria Sakkari.

The action really is compressed, and yes, the ladies deserve a separate day for their own final. But unless the Gregorian calendar can be revised, things aren’t going to change.

What’s changed for Fritz, the native southern Californian (lower case, he didn’t attend any university, much less USC), is that he’s become as effective with the forehand as the backhand.

That’s according to Andrey Rublev, whom Fritz defeated.

Rublev, higher ranked (eighth) than Fritz (16th), is the Russian who with a felt-tip pen a few weeks ago scribbled an anti-war message on a television camera lens.

Fritz, 24 (born Oct. 28, 1997), is exactly a week younger than Rublev, one of those bits of trivia that contribute to sporting interest.

His mother, Kathy May, was a tennis champion; His father, Guy, played professionally and coached. Taylor’s destiny was decided early. His success came later as a pro, Fritz battling all those eastern Europeans.

He played Nadal a couple of years back, but Rafa was more experienced, polished, and effective, toying with Fritz.

“I remember I felt like he kind of just played high spinny balls to me,” said Fritz about that match. “He like actually just gave me a lot of forehands in my favorite spot, like the shoulder-high one to like kind of slap flat, and I think he literally just kept doing it until like I missed eventually. I felt like almost baiting me to go for it.

“But yeah, I mean, I kind of beat myself trying to fire off winners against him. So I think my level's so much higher than then, so I won't, maybe won't be feeling like I need to pull the trigger so much, need to do so much. Like, I can kind of just play more within myself.”

Fritz is the first American male player to reach the Indian Wells finals since John Isner in 2012. The fact that it will be against Nadal, who is unbeaten in 20 matches this season (including that record-setting 21st major at the Australian Open), is another issue.

Still, he has taken a step beyond, and he’s satisfied as well he should be.

“When I hit (the final shot),” he said, “as soon as I hit the ball I was like, I think that's going to be good enough to win the point, and then, yeah, as soon as I saw that he hit it and it wasn't going to go on the court, I was just like, you know, so much relief and like, I mean, I just couldn't, you know, couldn't believe it.

“Those moments are like the reason why I wanted to be an athlete, wanted to play professional tennis. It's the best part of it all.”

Even when Rafa Nadal enters the picture.

Fritz likes the video — and his place in Indian Wells semis

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — This is how it is in tennis these days. Taylor Fritz has reached the Indian Wells semifinals and ranks first among American male players, but he’s still a distant second in popularity to the controversial video posted by his girlfriend.

Don’t you just love it? Fritz does, but others involved in his sport (the old boys) do not.

The hot news (in 87-degree weather, seemingly everything’s hot): Fritz, the 24-year-old from over the hill in San Diego, defeated his own nightmares (three double faults back-to-back-to-back in the second set) and Mimi Kecmanovic of Serbia, 7-6(5), 3-6, 6-1.

So, for a second straight BNP Paribas tournament (the last one, a mere five months ago, was a drop-in due to COVID-19), Fritz is in the final four.

In one semi on Saturday, he’ll face Andrey Rublev, who defeated Grigor Dimitrov, 7-5. 6-2. In the other, a couple of Spaniards, young Carlos Alcaraz and not-so-young Rafael Nadal, face each other.

So you say tennis is nothing but hitting balls across a net (as compared to golf, hitting balls in a pasture)? That’s where Fritz’s gal, Morgan Riddle, enters the scene — or more accurately, her TikTok video enters the screen. 

It shows life on the tour, and it’s registered something like 3.7 million views. It’s aimed at non-tennis people, with explanations of the game’s scoring system (of course some quips about “love”) and a bit of self-indulgence. It mentions the importance of the Grand Slams; Fritz did make the fourth round of the Australian.

“I know tennis is relatively uncool and unknown in America,” Riddle said of the reason for the project. That in the video Riddle says she gets to have “champagne and strawberries and cream” at Wimbledon, as well as “getting to wear really cute outfits,” irritated some critics.  

At Indian Wells earlier in the week, Fritz said he believes the video is good for the sport. “I think what she did was awesome for our sport," he said. “It got a ton of people looking at it.

"I’m the one that’s a professional tennis player, I’m the one that does this for a living. I 100 percent agree with everything in that video.”

The win over Kecmanovic was no less agreeable, even with all those uncharacteristic double faults.

“I have no idea what that was,” said Fritz. “I've never done that in my life. Like, I actually have no idea. I literally forgot how to play.

“I really could have easily let that bother me a lot, let it affect me in the third set. I kind of just tried to laugh it off and forget about it. Kind of embarrassing. I think a lot of people saw that.”

Like everyone spread about 16,000-seat Stadium One, and those watching live on Tennis Channel.

“Yeah, I just regrouped in the third. I just told myself it was a fluke, that's not going to happen again. Told myself I had lots of chances to break serve in the second set. He only had the one where I literally forgot how to play tennis. I told myself to regroup, do the same thing.

“I did in the second set, take care of my serve, win those break points. That's what I did.”   

It worked, obviously, and quickly enough there was Fritz, like an actor at curtain call, his arms out, thanking the cheering fans.

“I have a lot of family here,” said Fritz. “I played Easter Bowl here when I was a kid. A lot of history. My dad is the coach at College of the Desert here. I'd come here when I was a kid for the tournament.

“Just a place I'm really familiar with it. It feels like a second home, really.”

No controversial videos, just acceptance.

This is what makes Rafa great, says Kyrgios

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — Nick Kyrgios threw his racquet at the court, a symbolic gesture of frustration. Why not? In his mind, he already had thrown away his biggest match of the season.

Sport is awash in possibilities — the what-ifs, could-haves and should-haves. We learned that long ago, so it does no good to think Kyrgios looked very much as if he would defeat Rafael Nadal.

Because he didn’t.

Just the way over two months no one has defeated Nadal, from the Australian Open to Thursday’s quarterfinal in the BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells.

Rafa’s 7-6 (0), 5-7, 6-4 triumph in the sweltering 85-degree weather of the Coachella Valley — yes, it’s dry heat, but in a three-hour match, who cares? — gave him a mark of 19-0 for 2022.

And it gave Kyrgios, the 25-year-old Aussie with such athletic ability, and we’re told such potential, the agonizing second thoughts that inhabit the disappointed.

“That one hit pretty hard,” conceded Kyrgios, who got into the tournament as a wild card.

“I felt like, honestly, I was the one to end the streak. I felt like I was playing well. I felt like I did everything right in the first set that I planned to do. I sat down with my coach, myself, and I had a game plan, and everything was working. Two points away from the first set, I don't know how he got out of that game. 5-4, 30-15, just kept replaying that point over and over and … over again.”

Rafa got out of it because, at 35, he has the experience and most significantly the wherewithal. In short, been there, done that.

Nadal has won more than 400 matches, on clay — all those French Opens — on grass and as the surface is at Indian Wells, hard court.

“And competing, competing,” reminded Kyrgios about Nadal’s persistence.

“Somehow snagged the second and a couple points in the third that just, a couple break points. One of them I couldn't do anything on and two, I just missed a backhand by who knows, three inches. That's all it is against Rafa all the time.”

You don’t give Nadal an opportunity. The way you don’t give Tom Brady or didn’t give a younger LeBron James an opportunity. They’ll find a way to beat you, or to let you beat yourself.

“I did it emotionally and mentally,” explained Nadal about winning when others might not have won. “I was ready to keep fighting. So happy with the victory and of course happy with the level of the set.”

Analysts sought reasons, breaking down the little things, the response to some of Kyrgios’ errors, forced or unforced, or to Rafa’s own errors. No one, however, took issue with Kyrgios getting blanked, shut out in the first-set tiebreak. When’s the last time anybody, much less a quality player like Kyrgios, failed to score a tiebreak point?

Nadal, as is his right, wanted to reflect on the result, the victory. The rest is trivia, except for the guys and girls in the press box.

“For me, it was one more match,” said Nadal .“Honestly, no, it's another match of quarterfinals of a Masters 1000 in a big stadium, one of the best stadiums in the world, in front of a great crowd, great opponent in front.

“So for me it was like this, another (hard-fought) match that I needed to play, to play well to go through. I enjoy these kinds of matches. I enjoy the challenges. And today, I was able to keep going, and that makes me happy and makes me proud.”

Rafa said he wasn’t aware Kyrgios hurled his racquet after the final point. What Kyrgios was aware of was his opponent.

“He's too good, I guess.,” Kyrgios said. “He played a few points well and he got out of it and that's what he does. That's what makes him great.”

Exactly.

Just win, baby — and Nadal, Fritz do just that

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — Rafael Nadal keeps beating everyone he plays, and as sporting philosophers from Al Davis (“Just win, baby”) to Herman Edwards (“You play to win the game”) have told us, not much else matters. 

Sure, his victory over the 6-foot-11 Reilly Opelka in the BNP Paribas Open tournament was narrow. But it was a victory, the only sort of result Rafa has provided this year.

He won 7-6 (3), 7-6 (5) on (what else?) an 80-degree-plus Wednesday afternoon in the desert, extending his streak since the start of year (and including the Australian Open) to 18-0.

Not only does that represent perfection, it sets up a Thursday match against the guy who is part athlete (a very large part) and part entertainer, the Australian Nick Kyrgios, who says he’d rather be in the NBA on a basketball court than in an open on a tennis court.

The way basketball people used to get excited about a matchup between LeBron James and Steph Curry in the golden days of the Lakers way back in 2019, tennis folk are anticipating Rafa vs. Nick.

And not because it’s the only thing they have. The almost local kid, Taylor Fritz of San Diego, was a winner, defeating Alex de Minauer 3-6, 6-4, 7-6 (5).

So, no Roger (sob) or Novak (No-vax) but some intriguing competitors. At least to some mavens. The writer in the Desert Sun even called Nadal-Kyrgios “must see” tennis.” Wow.

Records in tennis may not be as accurate as those in, say, baseball, but apparently Guillermo Vilas of Argentina won 34 straight matches in the 1970s and Djokovic 53 straight in 2010-11.

Rafa, then, has a long way to go, and even though he’s a mere 35, it’s doubtful he’ll get to the big numbers. Still, 17 without a blemish is not unimpressive.

Similar to any top-line athlete, he says he’s unconcerned with all the numbers except the ones on his scorecard at the conclusion of a match. Is that the Spanish version of “just win, baby”?

Asked if he was happy that he won in straight sets, Nadal had a response often repeated in a career that has produced 401 victories (a record 21 in Grand Slams): “Happy to win. Doesn’t matter how many sets.“

Unless maybe it’s the fifth set of a four-hour Wimbledon semifinal, and recovery tie for the final would be limited. Not that things like that ever affected Rafa.

“But I am happy of course to be in the quarterfinals of this great tournament, playing better without a doubt,” he added. “That's my best match of the tournament. Happy the way that I was able to play during the whole match. I only played one bad game with myself. For the rest, I think I played solid. I did what I had to do against a very difficult player to play, like Reilly.”

Nadal, a four-time winner at Indian Wells, has a winning record against Kyrgios as he has against virtually everyone else.

“(Thursday) is going to be a tough match, but we are in quarterfinals of Indian Wells,” he said. “I have to expect a very tough opponent.”

It’s difficult to say what Fritz expected against de Minauer, but he was behind quickly. Strange thoughts then creep through one’s mind.

”We were talking about this after the match,” said Fritz, who then used a term that makes some athletes cringe. “I'll choke some matches here and there, for sure. A lot of people do. But then I'll also clutch out a lot of matches like I have the last two days, and this one felt really — honestly, the last two third-set breakers I played have been really solid for me, not a lot I did wrong either one.”

Not when you’re the winner.

Isner's win brings back memories — and brings up hopes

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — There was John Isner, the bill of his cap turned the wrong way, as if he were a baseball catcher and not a tennis player. He had overcome an 87-degree temperature and Diego Schwartzman, 7-5, 6-3, in a third-round match of the BNP Paribas Open.

Meaning he’ll move on.

But for so many of us, John Isner provides an excuse to look back, remembering both his own historic match at Wimbledon and, for no particular reason, a time when Americans could win major tournaments.

Maybe they still are capable.

Not Isner, admittedly. True, he reached the Wimbledon semifinals in 2018, but now he’s 36.

If a U.S. player is to break through, it will be somebody like Taylor Fritz or Francis Tiafoe, both 24.

Isner is still a player, as verified by his victory Tuesday over Schwartzman, who once was as high as eighth in the ATP rankings. He was one of four U.S. players to advance, including Fritz, who beat Alex de Minaur of Australia, 6-4, 2-6, 7-6 (2).

Fortunately or unfortunately, nationality plays an important role in tennis, alongside personality. With no team (other than the Davis Cup), the sport relies on fans supporting their men or women.

The greats, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Serena Williams, built an international reputation and following, but for the majority of tennis players where you’re from often counts as much as how you perform.

For a long time, the game seemingly belonged to American men. Pete Sampras, Andre Agassi, Jim Courier and Michael Chang won majors in the 1980s and 90s. But no U.S. player has taken a major since Andy Roddick won the U.S Open in 2003 — 19 years ago.

Isner made his run, with that big serve, but it wasn’t to be. His plaque on the wall at Wimbledon is for that 6-4, 3-6, 6-7, 7-6, 70-68 victory over Nicolas Mahut that took more than 11 hours in 2010.

Wimbledon then changed the tie-break rules, so that record will remain forever.

So, at times, does it appear will the record for America going winless in majors.

The potential is out there, numerous fine young American tennis players, one of whom, Jenson Brooksby, upset a major finalist, Stefanos Tsitsipas, here on Monday night. Potential, but so what? When will it be realized, if ever? And why won’t it be realized?

The United States has more people (other than a couple of Asian nations), better facilities and supposedly a love of sports. Yes, “love” is the tennis term for “nothing,” yet it shouldn’t be applied here.

The explanations for America’s ineffectiveness at Wimbledon, Australia or the U.S. Open — we’ll concede, no chance on the clay at Roland-Garros — are based on the thought that tennis is a minor sport.

Russians play tennis, Serbs play tennis, Spaniards play tennis. Americans play football, baseball, basketball, hockey and golf. Maybe it was Tiger Woods, or maybe it was stars from other sports in pro-ams, but golf has the popularity that tennis seeks.

The U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York City draws more than 500,000 spectators. It’s an event as much as a championship. Does it help any kid in the country become the U.S. Open winner? See the blanks.

Fritz has been touted since he dominated others at Torrey Pines High School in San Diego. His father is involved in the U.S. national tennis teaching program. His mother, Kathy May, was a tremendous player. He turned down a scholarship at USC to turn pro.

Five years later, with an improved forehand, Fritz said, “I expect a lot more of myself.

“I think just my level as a player has gone up. I feel I have gone up several levels, so yeah, I expect a lot more of myself. Six months ago, I think I was ranked almost 40, and now I’m between 15 and 20.”

No one wants him to play a marathon match like Isner — just do something Isner hasn’t, win a Grand Slam.

Medvedev’s loss was Djokovic’s gain

INDIAN WELLS, Calif. — So the unvaccinated Serb who isn’t even here because he’s unvaccinated will slip back atop the men’s rankings because the Russian who is here came apart in his match against the Frenchman.

Yes, tennis is very international. And at times quite nonsensical.

At the start of the second week of the BNP Paribas Open at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden, it was more a case of what didn’t happen than what did.

You like warmth? It was 86 degrees around 3 p.m. Monday.

You like upsets? Gael Monfils came from a set down and beat Daniil Medvedev, 4-6. 6-3, 6-2.

You like familiarity? Our old (relatively speaking) pal Rafael Nadal defeated Dan Evans, 7-5, 6-3, and now has won 17 straight matches and a total of 400 his career.

The ranking system in both men’s and women’s tennis seems part hopscotch, part quantum physics. Sure, victories are the most important element, but it’s also a matter of when and against whom. And don’t take time off for illness or injury, or you’re likely to plummet to where they’ll never find you on the chart.

This was a prelude to deal with Novak Djokovic, who won’t follow procedures in preventing Covid-19, and his opponent, Medvedev.

Novak loves Indian Wells and won it a few times. But he cannot play in the great state of California, as he could not in the great land of Australia because he is adamant about not receiving a vaccination.

That didn’t temporarily displace him from No. 1 in the rankings, Medvedev did. But Medvedev’s loss Monday means Djokovic gets the last laugh by regaining first place.

“He steps up the level a little bit,” Medvedev said, alluding to Monfils. “I couldn’t find it. I’m actually playing a little bit bad, which for me is not a bad thing.

“Yeah. I just couldn't find my rhythm and completely lost it in the third set because, I think actually first match and first set maybe played even a little bit bad, not a bad thing with me. So I think I got a little bit too confident in that, OK? I'm starting to feel my rhythm.

“Maybe should have paid more attention to small details, which, yeah, in the third set is really tough to get it back, and, yeah, it was going easy for him.”

Asked if there was added pressure because of the No. 1 ranking. Medvedev said, “Definitely not pressure. I thought it could give me more motivation, well, I have been motivated. It's just that, yeah, as I say, I didn't find my best tennis. Well, now I know l’m going to lose the No. 1. When I play my best tennis, it’s tough to beat me.”

Monfils, 35, has always been among the game’s most recognized players, agile and quick if not always consistent. A year ago he married Elina Svitolna, one of the top female competitors, and because she is Ukrainian as much in the headlines for her nationality as for her tennis.

He has been around, heard all the questions, given all the answers.

Monfils tried to downplay the win, realizing that at this stage — he beat Nadal 13 years ago — it’s as much a grind as a game.

“It's tough because you guys make it,” Monfils said, meaning the media.

“I make it like a good win, you know? But tough. I played a great player, of course, one of the best players. I just felt good today. Tactically, I was good. I'm full of confidence, of course, so you know, I'm just happy to win this match.”

 As happy as Medvedev was unhappy to lose his — and fall from No. 1.